The practical answer.
Request the released drawing and electrical data for the exact cell, plus any separate finished-pack documents needed for the project. Compare model, document version and test conditions across the files before accepting them as one evidence package.

Separate the released cell drawing from the pack drawing
Request the current cell outline with datum, thickness measurement conditions, terminal positions, tab material and seal keep-outs where applicable. If buying a pack, request a separate assembly drawing showing the completed harness, connector and protective electronics relevant to the host. A cell drawing cannot confirm fit of a finished battery assembly.
Document review register for a selected pouch design
| Record | Identifier to check | Decision owner |
|---|---|---|
| Released cell outline | Cell model, drawing revision, datum, tab positions and seal zones | Mechanical engineer checks packaging fit. |
| Electrical data sheet | Cell version, test conditions and allowed charging and discharge windows | Electrical engineer checks actual use profile. |
| Finished assembly record | Pack model, connector and wire revisions, protection configuration and documented changes | Pack and host teams resolve interface deviations. |
| Transport or other reports | Exact design identified in the document, revision, issuing party and stated scope | Responsible quality or shipping owner determines applicability. |

Read test conditions beside the specification
Check whether reported capacity is a typical value or a guaranteed minimum, and record the relevant temperature, discharge conditions and cutoff. Confirm the allowed charge and discharge windows for the exact product. A family page can help locate a candidate, but a specification decision depends on controlled files that match its revision.
Reconcile revisions across documents before approval
Keep a register with part number, revision, date, file owner and superseded versions. Confirm whether the protective circuit, terminal or interconnect changed between sample and production records. Require the responsible reviewer to close unresolved matches before using the evidence to approve the build.
Keep shipment scope with the exact design
When required, review a lithium battery test summary against the design offered for transport. Do not assume a cell-level file establishes evidence for a separate finished-pack design. Keep transport documentation, application validation and any market conformity evidence in their own rows, with responsibility and scope stated.
Sources & further reading
- Jetray 11.1 V 2300 mAh Li-ion polymer pack catalogue reference ↗
- Jetray LiPo battery product family ↗
- NASA requirements verification matrix reference ↗
- PHMSA U.S. lithium battery test summary guidance ↗
Prepared for the lithium polymer batteries collection. General engineering guidance does not replace a model-specific datasheet or application validation. Source review: 9 November 2026.